Notices
 
 

  

User Tag List

Thread: Worse Fuel Economy

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. Worse Fuel Economy 
    #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    26
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)
    Hello,

    I have reciently installed a K&N Airfilter to my 2000 (W) Golf TDi, in a vain attempt to make the fuel efficiency better (honest!). And in theroy, it should work, if it had enough air, but it doesnt!

    It comes with 2no tubes that fit next to the front off-side headlight (after you remove the cawling) and sucks a tiny bit of air from under the gap at the front of the bonnet, but it’s not enough.

    Does anybody have a design for air intake that doesnt involve cutting holes and putting stupid vents in body panels, and wont frighten me everytime it rains

    Or just any advice to make it better anyway....tis mighty frustrating!

    Many thanks in advance!
     
    0 0 0
     

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    27
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)
    Sadly there are only a couple of options open to you, Dan; one is to source the filter housing from a VR5 or VR6 and fit that as a direct substitute.
    You may have to 'cut and shut' the mounting points to get it to sit down properly, but it does flow a lot more than the standard article.
    The other way is to 'modify' your own airbox to accept a single 3" intake trunking hose to increase the flow into it; however off the top of my head I can't remember if you have to blank off the existing pickups and take the feed from the side of the box, or whether you can get away with opening up the holes in the existing face to get it to fit.
    Looking at the fundamental problem of poor MPG, it may well be that the MAP sensor is leaking internally, thus overfuelling all the way through the range up to say 60% boost, where it won't make any appreciable difference anyway.
    Certainly worth a look, as they are noted for this problem after a fair mileage.
    JB.
    230 BHP 2.3T5 + 4WD = Quick!
     
    0 0 0
     

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    26
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)
    This maybe (well...probably) a stupid question but, Is a MAP sensor the same as MAF sensor ie mounted on the main air intake hose? If so I had this (MAF),replaced around 25,000 miles ago.

    Do I remeber right when thinking the original box had an air intake coming from the wheel arch? Using the original box is more efficient then leaving the air filter open in the engine bay? Where would the new 3" hose draw air from?

    Thanks for help....I clearly need it!Dan
     
    0 0 0
     

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Devon, UK
    Posts
    511
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)
    Just to warn you, I have heard that the oil in K&N filters damages your MAF. Not sure how long this takes, but maybe it's worth fitting a stock filter. Some people believe that it's about as good as they get. Then perhaps it would help to fit more intake options...?
    Passat Sport Estate 2001 1.9 TDI PD
    100k miles
     
    0 0 0
     

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    27
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)
    That was quick, Dan!
    The MAF sensor (Mass Air Flow) measures the total amount of air going into the engine, but the MAP sensor (Manifold Absolute Pressure) tells the ECU what load is on the engine in terms of boost pressure.
    As the boost increases, the ECU widens the injector trigger pulsewidth, hence increasing the amount of fuel injected.
    As the MAP sensor always relates to atmoshperic pressure, any leakage will delay the onset of that increase, which in turn effectively starves the engine of fuel relative to the demand you're putting on it.
    The nett result of all this is that the donkey feels sluggish, particularly in the lower range, which leads to bigger throttle openings for longer periods to get the required performance.
    Taken as a whole, the gross effect is the use of far more fuel than an equivalent motor not thus affected.
    I hope I've explained it logically enough!
    As for the filter side of things, I'd assumed that you're still using the original VW filter housing with a K&N element fitted?
    If that's not the case, could you please explain how you've got it set up?
    JB.
    230 BHP 2.3T5 + 4WD = Quick!
     
    0 0 0
     

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    26
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyBee View Post
    That was quick, Dan!
    The MAF sensor (Mass Air Flow) measures the total amount of air going into the engine, but the MAP sensor (Manifold Absolute Pressure) tells the ECU what load is on the engine in terms of boost pressure.
    As the boost increases, the ECU widens the injector trigger pulsewidth, hence increasing the amount of fuel injected.
    As the MAP sensor always relates to atmoshperic pressure, any leakage will delay the onset of that increase, which in turn effectively starves the engine of fuel relative to the demand you're putting on it.
    The nett result of all this is that the donkey feels sluggish, particularly in the lower range, which leads to bigger throttle openings for longer periods to get the required performance.
    Taken as a whole, the gross effect is the use of far more fuel than an equivalent motor not thus affected.
    I hope I've explained it logically enough!
    As for the filter side of things, I'd assumed that you're still using the original VW filter housing with a K&N element fitted?
    If that's not the case, could you please explain how you've got it set up?
    JB.
    Well, I am keen to diagnose this....well while I’m at work anyway (nothing like getting paid to sort out other things!!)

    Ok, thank you for that explanation. Is there anyway I can effectively determine it is the MAP sensor, or is it a case of changing it and see??

    If so, how do I go about replacing it?

    This is a picture of the inside engine bay (not my car) http://www.tuningdirekt.com/catalog/images/K&N/57-0222.jpg
    Even shows the 2no shoddy tubes that they ask you to wedge next to the front offside headlight and zip tie to the battery cable. There’s got to be a way of getting a better supply of air to it.
    Dan
     
    0 0 0
     

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    26
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Huweth View Post
    Just to warn you, I have heard that the oil in K&N filters damages your MAF. Not sure how long this takes, but maybe it's worth fitting a stock filter. Some people believe that it's about as good as they get. Then perhaps it would help to fit more intake options...?

    Really??....Damn!
    I have had problem in the past (with MAF), it stopped my car going above 80mph. Had it replaced and....well....I can still exceed that (not that it happens often....*cough*cough*).

    Wonder if there is anyway to protect it, does the MAF sensor degrade over time (get progressively worse), or just all-of-a sudden fail? - I cant believe I took my car to a garage to get it replaced last time

    Dan
     
    0 0 0
     

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    563
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)
    Basically the oil on the filter gets sucked towards the engine and any excess can stick to the MAF element, this in turn can reduce the MAF's sensing capabilities.

    I have just fitted a K&N panel filter to my TDi, but before I fitted it I washed it in hot water first to remove any excess oil and a fair amount came out. Its a red oil. The oil is there to filtrate even more than the cotton guaze. Unless its driven in a really dusty environment then it will be OK with less oil. It will probably take a few thousand miles to affect the MAF sensor, but they can be cleaned!! You can clean them with electrical contact cleaner and either blow hard with mouth or if you have one an air compressor. Some have noticed an improvement after cleaning even with a standard filter.
     
    0 0 0
     

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    26
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Avant View Post
    Basically the oil on the filter gets sucked towards the engine and any excess can stick to the MAF element, this in turn can reduce the MAF's sensing capabilities.

    I have just fitted a K&N panel filter to my TDi, but before I fitted it I washed it in hot water first to remove any excess oil and a fair amount came out. Its a red oil. The oil is there to filtrate even more than the cotton guaze. Unless its driven in a really dusty environment then it will be OK with less oil. It will probably take a few thousand miles to affect the MAF sensor, but they can be cleaned!! You can clean them with electrical contact cleaner and either blow hard with mouth or if you have one an air compressor. Some have noticed an improvement after cleaning even with a standard filter.
    That good to know, many thanks. You think washing it would help, the open filter I have?

    Do you know any particular products. To be honest Ive had a look online (quickly), and I cant find (well...more like, know), how to clean it - got any tips?
    Dan
     
    0 0 0
     

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    563
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)
    For the filter, I just used hot water with a very small amount of Mr.Muscle as you don't want to completley remove the oil from the filter, then leave to dry.

    The leccy cleaner, I got mine from http://www.cef.co.uk/ its made by Acorn I think. I have 2 types, one cleans and the other cleans and protects, for the MAF you want the one which cleans and DOESN'T protect.
     
    0 0 0
     

Similar Threads

  1. Golf mk4 1.6 s very bad fuel economy
    By baz2963 in forum Golf MK4 - 1999 - 2004
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 17-12-2007, 01:39 AM
  2. Worse Fuel Economy
    By Danbag in forum Chat - Completely Off Topic
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-01-2007, 11:26 AM
  3. TDi 130 Poor fuel economy
    By jeremyh in forum Audi A4 - B6 Forum - 2002 - 2005
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-11-2006, 11:14 AM
  4. Fuel Economy Golf MK3 1.8 se
    By markgrocock in forum Golf - Jetta - Vento - Bora - Archive Topics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 25-06-2006, 09:40 PM
  5. fuel economy
    By glynnd in forum Passat - Archive Topics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 26-03-2006, 06:08 PM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


 



  


Disclaimer: VW Audi Forum is an "independant enthusiast website", administered in line with guidelines supplied by VAG in the UK, and is in no way related to any of the Worldwide Volkswagen,Audi,Seat,Skoda,Bentley,Bugatti,Porsche or Lamborghini group of Companies. For official up to date information on any of there vehicles, please visit the official websites. Any comments made throughout this website, are the views of the respective poster, and in no way represent the views of the VW Audi Forum Administration, or the worldwide Volkswagen & Audi Group of companies.


VW Audi Forum do not vet and are not responsible for any information which is posted in this forum. All content is viewed and used by you at your own risk and we do not warrant the accuracy or reliability of any of the information.


Copyright: Certain "words", "phrases" and "Images" used on this website by the Administration are "Copyright" of Volkswagen GB, Volkswagen AG (Germany), Audi GB, Audi AG (Germany), Volkswagen Motorsport GB, Volkswagen Motorsport AG (Germany), Audi Motorsport AG (Germany), Volkswagen Racing GB, Bentley, Bugatti, Porsche and Lamborghini. No image can be replicated by anyone WITHOUT the relevant Companies written permission.


All trademarks and copyrights remain property of their respective owners.

No part of the VW Audi Forum website or forum may be reproduced without written permission from the site administration


PLEASE NOTE - PERSONAL ABUSE, ABUSE AGAINST THIS OR ANY OTHER WEBSITE OR ANY COMPANY WILL NOT BE TOLERATED. OFFENDERS WILL BE MODERATED OR EVEN BANNED.


This website and forum are best viewed at a minimum resolution of 1024 by 768.



  



- VW AUDI Forum - The #1 Volkswagen (VW) Group Forum - Volkswagen (VW) - Audi - Seat - Skoda - Bentley - Bugatti - Lamborghini - Porsche - Scania - MAN - Ducatti - VW Audi Forum -


- www.vwaudiforum.co.uk - www.vwaudiforum.co.uk -