Top gear

[Guest 2]

Suppose so, but that understeer was horrific, maybe it was just Jeremy not being able to drive properly lol.

Edit - is that an automatic C'eed?!

Edit - Does this:


Remind you of this:

[kodkod.84]

All the write ups I've read about the RS5 don't rate it much as a hardcore track car more of a fast tourer. Was the b7 RS4 faster round the track?

[Guest 2]

The RS4 was 1.25.7

[fourringsrus]

Though Jeremy can obviously drive a fast car fast, anyone who has caned a quattro knows there is a way to get the best from it.
I wonder how the test would have gone with Audis' test driver in the RS5 and BMWs' own test driver in the M3.
Both cars are very pretty but I'd stick with the four rings

[Guest 2]

As you say, if two 'experienced' drivers were in each car I'd say the RS5 would show it's full potential an perform better.

What is the sports diff anyway available on the RS5? never understood what is was.

[phil miller]

Missed it yet again tuesday night tv is now mine, if im allowed lmao

[SammoVWT]

I think if the rs5 was 2-wheel and not 4 it would have done better, the heavy drive system is clearly weighing it down, plus all the ott gizmos. It's more like a salesmans car.

[Guest 2]

Topgear's just started folks.

[phil miller]

John prescott is a bit of a dinny, dont like him one bit, i wonder if he rolls the car

[phil miller]

question everyone they have just shown the moon footage now my question is if there is no gavity when they were giving it large in looner rover why when it sprayed up the moon mud did it fall back down, surely it should have carried on floating (please dont come out with the dont call me surely line lol) my dad has always said the moon landing never happened and has come up with many reasons but having just seen the moon buggy its made me think many be is right

thoughts??????